Diamondback vs. Trek, Which One Appeals to You?

Diamondback vs. Trek

Aesthetic appeal is a feature that is often traded for other desirable features. This Diamondback vs. Trek review examines two bikes to help you decide which one is a better option for you.

I am the typical urban rider. I use my bike to run errands around town and take long rides to the outskirts during the weekend. I often ride the bus with my bike when it is more convenient to do so. I believe the bike I ride should complement me in terms of aesthetics. I need a bike that is light enough to carry onto the bus when need be, as well as aesthetically pleasing enough for me to proudly ride around town.

What are the differences between Diamondback and Trek? How do they compare?

Diamondback Release 4C Carbon
Trek Émonda ALR 5 Disc
Fox 34 Performance Float,
Émonda carbon disc
Diamondback Blanchard 28R, Tubeless Compatible, 32h
Bontrager Affinity Tubeless Ready Disc
SRAM NX Eagle, 12 Speed
Shimano 105, 11 speed

Diamondback vs. Trek. What Are the Differences?


The Diamondback’s frame is made from Carbon Release 27.5, Monocoque Carbon. This means the carbon is produced using a structural system in which weight is supported through the frame’s external skin. True monocoque is identified by the absence of an internal frame to hold the weight. This results in a light and strong frame.

The Trek’s frame is made from Ultralight 300 Series Alpha Aluminum. This is Trek’s premium grade aluminum which is hydro formed to produce tubes of precise sizes. Precise sizing ensures that each tube can fit to its neighbor perfectly. This saves weight without compromising strength at joints. The result is good ride quality, a strong structure and an ideal balance between weight and stiffness.

Cable Routing

The Diamondback has all its cable routed internally, with the exception of brake cables. The Trek has all cables routed internally. The main advantage of internal cable routing is aesthetic because it gives a clean, neat look to the frame. It also helps in cleaning because you don’t have to work your way around the cables which may make the cleaning process longer and more cumbersome. The downside to internal cables is the cost of maintenance because you may have to take your bike to the shop to have an expert access cables for replacement.


Diamondback’s bike has flat bar handlebars which provide better control for climbing. The Trek has drop bars which are more aerodynamic. When descending a steep trail for instance, crouching down to the drops saves you pedaling energy and enables you coast for a significant distance. The downside to drop bars is in maintenance. They are generally more fragile than flat bars and are more difficult to come by when you need to replace them.


Diamondback’s bike comes with Maxxis Minion Folding tires while the Trek has Bontrager R1 Hard-Case Lite, 700x 25c tires. Folding tires are a type of clincher tires in which a bundle of Kevlar strands replaces wire bundles. This allows you to fold up the tire which saves on space. This also makes the tire lighter. Foldable tires are between 50g and 90g lighter than non-foldable tires.

Diamondback Review

The Release 4C Carbon is Diamondback’s first full suspension carbon bike. It combines a short 130 mm of rear travel and a long 150mm of travel in the front. This is why the bike is fast and still remains steady on rough ground.

This bike has SRAN Guide hydraulic brakes which give you confidence to take on high speeds and steep descents. Hydraulic brakes are considered more efficient than mechanical brakes though maintenance costs associated with hydraulics are higher.

The DB35 Alloy stem with 40mm Reach provides good control and gives you a confident downhill ride. It also contributes to overall comfort which you will notice during long-distance rides.


  • Fast climber
  • Foldable tires


  • Very thin plastic front fender


View price on Amazon


Trek Review

The Émonda ALR 5 Disc is a climbing road bike. Trek call it their ‘lightweight aluminum perfection.’ The aim behind its build and design is to achieve aluminum-light weight with the look and handling of a carbon bike.

Trek utilizes what it calls Invisible Weld Technology. This is a welding process which produces aesthetically pleasing, finely tuned welds. This technology is responsible for the bike’s carbon-like appearance. Its overall effect is an increase in the surface area of the frame which increases strength while keeping weight at a minimum.

The Shimano 105 flat mount hydraulic disc brake set gives you smooth, effortless braking. The main benefits of this type of brake sets is that their braking power is accessed with much less force on the brake lever than in mechanical brakes. This makes it easier to modulate brake power. Another advantage is that these brakes work well all year round. In extreme summer heat as well as in freezing winter rain when your bike may get covered in sludge.


  • Fast climber
  • Lightweight
  • Aluminum frame with carbon-like aesthetics
  • Smooth, effortless breaking


  • Unsatisfactory handling


View price on Amazon


Final Word

Diamondback’s 4C Carbon bike is a heavy, hardy mountain bike designed for steep trails and rough terrain. It is ideal for bush adventure riders because it is hardy enough to take the beatings of off-road riding. Its wide tires help absorb effects of bumps. In this Diamondback vs. Trek comparison, Trek’s Émonda ALR 5 Disc wins because it meets the exact needs of the target market considered. It is light in weight and bears the physical appearance of a higher–end carbon bike. This road bike is built for smooth paved roads which are characteristic of urban settings, and is light enough to be carried on a bus or fastened onto a vehicle.


Who makes Diamondback bikes?

Derby Cycle Corporation purchased Diamondback Bicycles in 1999. Derby Cycle also owned the Raleigh Bicycle Company so the two (Raleigh and Diamondback) were merged. Two years later, Derby Cycle sold the two brands which still have the same owners today.

What is the difference between a road bike and a mountain bike?

The real difference is in the kind of road they are made for. A road bike is made with paved roads and speed in mind. A mountain bike is made with versatility for all kinds of trails and durability in mind.

How many calories does a 30-minute bike ride burn?

The main variable to consider is speed at which one is cycling. Cycling at a speed of 12-14mph enables the average adult (weighs 175 pounds) burn about 346 calories. If the same individual cycles at a slightly higher speed, 14-16 mph for instance, he burns about 420 calories in the same time.

What is a safe speed on a road bike?

Occasional cyclists generally keep a pace of 12mph (20km/h.) Regular cyclists like commuters typically ride faster, maintaining an average of 15.5mph (25km/h)

Can biking help improve my running?

Cycling makes you use leg muscles which compliment muscles used when running. It then follows that consistent cycling makes your leg muscles stronger and more efficient, which helps you run faster.



Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here